You are here:

Excel/distinct (unique) count

Advertisement


Question
QUESTION: Is there a way to create a formula that counts the number of time a unique records is found in a particular range.
counta(...) will count the number of record in the range, regardless if the record is there 5 times...
I know that I can use the Advance filter to do it but I just want the number on top of my header.

ANSWER: Yes there is a way, to answer your question.

---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------

QUESTION: Sorry about the semantic...
How would I do this?  What is the formula?

Answer
Daniel:


No problem.  Rather than retype what has already been typed many times already then see the two links below for a few ways to do what you want to do.  You don't tell me what the range is that is to be evaluated for unique items so I could not give you a specific formula.


http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/excel/HP030561181033.aspx

http://www.mrexcel.com/forum/showthread.php?t=70835

Hope this helps
About Excel
This topic answers questions related to Microsoft Excel spreadsheet (or workbook) stand-alone or Mircrosoft Office Excel including Excel 2003, Excel 2007, Office 2000, and Office XP. You can get Excel help on Excel formulas(or functions), Excell macros, charting in Excel, advanced features, and the general use of Excel. This does not provide a general Excel tutorial nor the basics of using a spreadsheet. It provides specific answers to using Microsoft Excel only. If you do not see your Excel question answered in this area then please ask an Excel question here

All Answers

Answers by Expert:


Ask Experts

Volunteer


Bill

Expertise

I can provide help with most all EXCEL questions and most all questions about writing EXCEL macros. I have been developing macros for about 10 years in EXCEL and have switched to it from Lotus 1-2-3 after about 10 years of writing macros in it. Typically, I will not write a macro for you unless it is very short because of all the details a macro has to know about to work every time all the time. Please understand that I do not know it all and will be the first to say so. As politely as possible, I don't write macros for people on this site who need one, want one, seem to imply that they need one, and/or seem to think I am expected to write one UNLESS they are very short, quick, and simple. 99% of all macros are more involved than what you think and rarely am I provided with enough specific and complete details to have the code work the first time and every time. This typically means too many follow-up emails, and subsequent macro changes due to lack of specific details, just to get those details so that the macro would work, all of which is on my own free time. The voice of experience from responding to many questions from people who ask me to write a macro for them from this site tells me this. I don't mean to come across as unhelpful but macros are usually very specific and without ALL of the specifics the macro I would write will not address all of your needs and the layout, location, formatting, conditions, etc. of your data and any related files the macro would have to work with. What seems like a simple task to you is almost always more involved than what you think to have the macro ALWAYS work in EVERY situation. If you have a macro you have already written and have a question about it then perhaps I could help with that. I am sure and hope you can and do understand.

©2009 About.com, a part of The New York Times Company. All rights reserved.