Excel/Microsoft Excel Column Name Updates.
Do you feel Column Name changes from A, B, C to 1., 2., 3., 4. will have more advantages over the current
column name as A,B,C ... i.e. Similar to IP Address example 22.214.171.124
The Record/s names will remain the same as 1,2,3 ....
For example A1 refers to Column 1, Row 1 and has value as 3 so we refer the cell value as A1=3
Now instead of A1=3, we will refer as 1.1=3
For example C4 refers to Column 3, Row 4 and has value as Hello so we refer the cell value as C4=Hello
Now instead of C4=Hello, we will refer as 3.4=Hello
Since the column name is changed from character to whole number(integer), the values in the column can take any positive limits.
For example :
999.56 refers to column 999 and row 56
3456.43 refers to column 3456 and row 43
Note : Column Name should be changed to 1. (i.e. 1 followed by a Dot) and not only 1 because if we keep only 1 then for example 123 creates a ambiguity of which is the column i.e. 1 or 12.
In this example 123 will lead to column 1, row 23 or column 12, row 3.
12.3 refers to column 12, row 3
1.23 refers to column 1, row 23
i.e. Since the current convention if replaced by 1.,2.,3., the number of columns can exceed the limit of 16,384 columns i.e. 1,048,576 and we can have a large data set.
i.e. Now we can have 1,048,576 rows by 1,048,576 columns by taking this convention.
Also instead of . (dot) we can also use , (comma) for column,row bifurcation ?.
As for examples,
1.1 refers to column 1, row 1
1,1 refers to column 1, row 1
The current convention for the above example is A1. i.e. column 1, row 1.
Awaiting your reply,
Thanks & Regards,
Prashant S Akerkar
>>i.e. Now we can have 1,048,576 rows by 1,048,576 columns by taking this convention.
We already have 1,048,576 without using this convention.
>>1,1 refers to column 1, row 1
Because we use commas in CSV files, no.
XFD1048576 method is much fewer characters that 1048576,1048576. Hence our files will be smaller.