AboutAzeem Hussain Expertise I can answer mostly any kind of question dealing with of Math 536 and below, my forte being in parabolic functions and analytical geometry.
I'm currently learning Calculus III, and cannot answer questions that deal with subject matter more advanced than that.
Experience I am neither a professor nor a teacher of this subject. I am merely a student who is good at mathematics and enjoys being of service to his community. I frequently tutor people in math and the results are usually great.
Publications Reflections, Riverside School Board (2005, 2006)
Education/Credentials Diploma of Secondary Studies from Chambly Academy High School, and IBO-MYP certificate as well. My lowest mark on a high school math final was 97%, peaking at 99% in 2006 and 2007 (second-highest Math 436 mark in the province). Being a Quebecer, I am fluent in English and French and can respond to questions easily in both languages.
Awards and Honors Pascal Math Competition, School Champion(2007)
Question QUESTION: Hello, I really need your help. I have struggled with this for months. I have a prrof that i cant seem to get right, do you have an email where I can send you an attachment of the problem?
ANSWER: Hello Robert,
Well I suppose I do, but begin by asking me the question by describing the situation. AllExperts also allows you to attach a picture with your question, so you might be able to do that. I'm not comfortable giving my email address out over here. Ask a follow-up and attach a picture, and we'll take it from there.
Azeem
---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------
QUESTION: Here is everything, I hope that it came thru if not, let me know and I will try to explain it all in a write up.
The proof looks good to me. If there is something specific that you need clarification with, feel free to ask. Other than that, I'd say you've nailed this.
Thanks for asking,
Azeem
---------- FOLLOW-UP ----------
QUESTION: i was told that I needed to be a step added after step 3 having to do with the congruency of rgith angles. Do you know what the statement and reason would be for that step?
Thanks again, I appreciate your help.
Answer Hi Robert,
It seems as though your reason for statement 3 is mismatched. I think you should first state that the angle measures are 90 degrees (definition of perpendicular). Afterwards you can mention that the angles are congruent (90 degrees congruent to 90 degrees).
){kind=link}