Human Resources/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
1. "Investment, Financing and Dividend decisions are interrelated." Evaluate this statement.
2. "There is nothing like an optimum capital structure for a firm" - Critically examine this statement.
3. The following information are related to Sun Ltd.
Paid-up equity capital 10,00,000
Earnings of the company ` 1,00,000
Dividend paid ` 80,000
Price - Earning ratio (PIE) ` 20
No. of equity shares ` 1,00,000
Find out whether the dividend payout of Sun Ltd., is optimal. [Use Walter's model].
4. The following information are available in respect of companies M and N
Company M Company N
Equity share capital (`10 each) 20,00,000 10,00,000
14% Debentures 5,00,000 15,00,000
EBIT 5,00,000 5,00,000
Return on capital employed 20% 20%
Tax rate 40% 40%
From the above information, calculate:
a) Financial leverage
b) Rate of return on equity share capital
c) Earnings per share
Also state which company's shareholders are in a better position financially?
1.Investment, Financing and Dividend decisions are interrelated." Evaluate this statement.
Inter-relationship Between Investment , Financing
Three major functions of finance department are :
_ Financing Decision: This function is mainly concerned with determination of optimum capital structure of the company keeping in mind cost , control and risk. It is also known as Procurement of Fund.
_ Investment Decision: It is also known as Effective
Utilization of Fund. In this respect finance department has to identify the investment opportunities and to choice the best
one , after a proper evaluation.
_ Dividend Decision: The finance manager is also
concerned with the decisions to pay or declare dividend. He assists the top management to decide the portion of profit to\ be declared as dividend.
So far the objective is concerned , the above stated three functions are same i.e. maximizing shareholders wealth. As their objectives are same the decisions are interrelated. A company having profitable investment opportunities , generally prefer lower dividend pay out ratio. On the other
hand having a good investment means profit of the company would be more and more dividend can be paid to shareholders. Similarly , finance
function and investment functions are also highly correlated. Cost of capital plays a major role whether to accept or not an investment
opportunities. Financing decisions also dependent on amount of to be retained in the profit.
So , we can conclude that investment , financing and dividend decisions are interrelated and are to be taken jointly keeping in view their joint effect on
the shareholders wealth.
Financial decisions in any business can be essentially divided into two categories; those pertaining to raising of finance and those pertaining to using the finance. The former are known as financing decisions and the latter investment decisions. These are also termed as capital structure and capital budgeting decisions, or source mix and operating decisions, respectively.
When internally generated funds, namely profits are inadequate for the purposes of business, the management necessarily has to raise funds from outside, which may be either in the form of debt or equity. On the other hand, when profits generated in the course of business are sufficiently large, a part of it may be retained for the purposes of the business and the rest distributed away as dividends.
The decision on how much of the profits are to be retained and how much are to be paid out as dividends depends on several factors, such as the need for funds in business, the expectations of the shareholders, availability of investment opportunities to the business, alternative investment opportunities for the shareholders and so on. Ideally, a management should not retain the profits if it cannot reinvest the profits at a rate higher than what the shareholders can earn elsewhere.
If under such a situation a management retains any profit, the market price of the company’s shares would go down, so that the shareholders wealth will reduce. This will be counter to the corporate financial objective. For the same reason, a management should not distribute dividends if it could earn for its shareholders more than what they could earn elsewhere.
In practice, even when funds are required in the business for various purposes, the management may be constrained to pay out at least some dividends, to meet the shareholders’ expectations. There is a whole lot of theory which describes the impact of dividend payments on the wealth of the shareholders.
Besides financing, the other major preoccupation of the management is to invest the money raised. Clearly, investment would make sense only if a management could earn from a project (say a manufacturing activity) a return, which is in excess of the return expected by the stakeholders, namely the shareholders and the lenders of money on their investments. In general; however, opportunities for investment in the environment may be infinite.
Of these opportunities, the management must be able to identify those opportunities which will yield a positive net present value. i.e. projects whose present value of future expected cash inflows are in excess of the initial investment. Only such a course of action will increase the wealth of the shareholders.
Again, in case the management had access to unlimited amount of funds from the capital market (at least conceptually if not practically) it would be able to accept all the projects with positive net present value, so long as the projects were not mutually exclusive. This; however, is rarely the case; in reality a management often works under funds constraints. Under such a situation, one cannot accept all the projects yielding positive NPVs. Clearly some kind of categorization or ranking or projects is called for, so that the best among them within the constraint of funds available for investment could be accepted. Given the NPV rule and the corporate objective, the best project would be the one with the highest NPV. In general, the cash flows represented by a project are discounted by the weighted average cost of capital of the company in order to arrive at the NPV of the project. Uncertainty of future cash flows adds to the complexity of the investment decisions.
2."There is nothing like an optimum capital structure for a firm" - Critically examine this statement
The Optimal Capital structure is that Capital Structure at
which the weighted Average cost of capital (Ko) is Minimum.
It is that combination of Equity and Debt at which the
total cost of capital is minimum.
There is nothing called optimal capital structure. optimal capital structure for a company refers to the composition of debt and equity, where the firm cost of capital is the lowest and value of the firm the highest. Optima capital structure for one company can not be same for the other company as well as the firms differ from each other in their basic characteristics. Even if the firm have same basic characteristics, they differ in Human resource, skill set etc.
Under different theory, things differ a lot. Perhaps there's no optimal capital structure in pecking-order theory but in reality most companies set a target debt-to-equity (D/E) ratio. Anyway, let's focus on trade-off theory first.
Trade-off theory argues that there's an optimal amount of debt of each firm. At this level of debt, firms can take the most advantage of debts. Debts can be tax shie
ld so that they can save money for firms to reinvest in other projects so as to earn more profits. However, debts can be quite dangerous because highly leveraged firms may face bankruptcy and financial distress costs (no matter they're direct or indirect) may increase the cost of debt of the company. Therefore, there must be a level of debt that make the benefits of debt and potential danger of debt offset each other. In another word, the marginal revenue of debt equals the marginal cost of debt. But remember, the real cases are not as easy as we put here.
When a firm procures funds from investors or owners, there will be an explicit or implicit promise to pay return to them. The return is paid in terms of interest which is compulsory paid to all investors and owners, but the return paid to owners in the form of dividends is optional. The dividend decision by any firm, like the investment and financing decisions is also taken for maximization of market price of the share.
The term dividend refers to that the portion of profit (after tax) which is distributed among owners/shareholders of the firm and the profit which is not distributed is called as retained earnings –
Dividend Payout Ratio is determined by the dividend policy adopted by the company, and it is implemented to decide about the percentage of profits to be distributed by the firm to its owners/shareholders. Dividend is always depends on the total profit that a firm acquired after taxes. There are a few factors that affect the Dividend policy of a company they are
Liquidity 2. Growth Plans 3. Control
Dividend Payout Ratio is also called as DP Ratio which is a mathematical value as
DP Ratio = Dividend paid to the Shareholders / Net Profit after tax.
Capital Structural Theories
Capital structural theories are designed with a concept of valuation of the firm; it is the earnings of the firm and the investments made by the firm. Capital Structural Theories also used to find the dividend payout for its owners/shareholders. Cost of the capital, investment and return on investment (ROI) are a part of dividend policy.
The relationship between leverage cost of capital and the value of the firm can be analyzed in different ways. Factors determining Capital Structure are minimization of risk, control, flexibility and the profitability of the firm. A firm's capital structure is a combination of the firm's liabilities (debts) and the assets (equity and profits).
For Example: A firm with 100 billion as capital structure has 40 billion from equity (shareholders and owners) and the 60 million as debt (Loans and Funding), then the firm is said to be 40% - equity financed and 60% - debt financed.
With cost valuation of the firm determined using capital structure and the net operating profit using EBIT analysis we can determine the dividend payout for owners and shareholders for the firm.
Every firm has a dividend payout policy and it was always analyzed after the capital structure methods. There are some managerial implications that can be analyzed under capital structure theories for dividend policy, saying that dividend policies are always affected by the capital structural theories.
There are two types of Capital Structural Theories
Non-Traditional Capital Structural Theories
Net Income (NI) approach is to determine the relationship between leverage, cost of capital and the value of the firm. As suggested by Durand, this theory states that there is a relationship between the capital structure and the value of the firm, therefore the firm can affect its value by increasing or decreasing the debt proportion in the overall finance mix.
Debt financing proportion is also considered in this approach, and then determines the distribution of funds as dividends.
Three variables are taken into consideration,
E - Value of Equity
O - Constant Value and
D - Value of Debt
For all levels of debt financing the O is constant and E and D are variable values, If D is less than E then there is an increase in the value of the firm.
Under NI approach, the firm will have the maximum value capital at a point where constant (O) is minimized. With a judicious use of debt and equity, a firm can achieve optimal capital structure.
Net Operating Income (NOI) approach is just an opposite of NI approach. According to the NOI approach, the market value of the firm depends upon the net operating income or profit and the overall cost of capital.
NOI approach is based on the argument that the market values the firm as a whole for a given risk complexion. Thus, for a given value of the firm remain the same irrespective of the capital composition and instead on the overall cost of capital.
Mathematically Net Operating Income (NOI) is
Value of the Firm = Earnings before Tax / Cost of Equity Capital
Net Operating Income approach says that an increase in debt proportion of the capital source will always result in increase of the equity proportion of the firm.
Modigliani-Miller model which was presented in the year of 1958 on the relationship of leverage, cost of capital and the value of the firm. This is widely used capital structure method to analyze the value of the firm.
They have shown that the financial leverage doesn't matter and the cost of capital and the value of the firm are independent of the capital structure. Modigliani-Miller methods show that there is nothing which may be called as Optimal Capital Structure - to get high valuation of the firm.
Modigliani-Miller model is based on following assumptions:
The capital markets are perfect and complete information is available to all the investors free of cost. The implication of this assumption is that investors can borrow and lend funds at the same rate and can move quickly from one security to another,
Securities are infinitely divisible; Investors are rational and well informed about the risk-return of all the securities.
Modigliani-Miller model says that the total value of the firm is equal to the capitalized value of the operating earnings of the firm. The capitalization is to be made at a rate appropriate to the risk class of the firm.
Managerial implications that can be drawn from capital structure theories for dividend policy?
Dividends are given to owners/shareholders only when the firm is having profits after tax. In order to make a dividend policy the firm should have a capital structure theory that will determine the value of the firm and the operating income.
In dividend decisions, a finance manager should decide one or more of the following:
Should the profits be ploughed back to finance the investment decisions
Whether any dividend be paid?
How much dividends to be paid?
When these dividends be paid?
In what form the dividends are paid?
Growth Plans, are involved in capital structural theories in which a certain amount will be allocated for the growth plans. A finance manager should draw a plan according for the dividend policy.
For Example: The firm has $10 million as equity capital and $6 million as debt capital and the firm made a profit (after tax) of $2 million, and the fund allocated to the growth plan was $1 million.
For suppose there are 10,000 shareholders in the company and as per capital structural theories some amount will be allocated for the liquidity that is five hundred thousand and the remaining amount should be distributed as Dividends. In this case each shareholder or the owner will receive $50 as dividend.
Legal and Procedural Considerations: When the firm issues shares to public, the firm should issue a share information brochure which contains the details of dividends and extra bonus -according to company laws.
Capital structural theories say that if a firm is in profit and it is looking to expand the business, the profit can be rolled over to the investment option.
In this case there will be no dividends or bonuses issued to the shareholders or the owners.
For Example: Low-payout consequences, which is done when the cash gets accumulated the financial manager may be tempted to take on more projects that do don't meet the minimum rate of return investments.
If a firm has $1 million as operating income with 1000 shareholders and firms adopts to take new projects with the profit. Then this may cause unrelated relationship balances between the shareholders and the management of the firm.
Payment of Dividend & Raising of fresh Capital: Finance manager has task to do the both the works i.e. payment of dividend to the shareholder's and owner's and also raising the fresh capital. Modigliani-Miller Model proves that this can be done, and every investor should be known with these details.
Modigliani-Miller Model has shown that the dividend payment will not have any effect on the value of the firm. If firm pays the dividends resulting in increase in the market value of the share and the firm. The effect on the value of the firm will be neutralized by the decrease in the terminal value of the share.
For Example: A firm has 1, 00,000 shares outstanding and is planning to declare a dividend of $5 at the end of current financial year. The present value of the share is $100. The cost of equity capital E may be taken at 10%. The expected market price at the end of the year may be under two options.
Dividend of $5 is paid
Dividend is not paid
If the dividend of $5 is paid (The value of D = 5)
P - Present value of the share (P = 100)
E - Cost of equity (E = 10)
P1 - Expected Market Price of the Share
As per Modigliani-Miller Model
P1 = P (1+E)-D
P1 = 100(1+10) - 5
P1 = 105
So, the market price of the share is expected to be $105, if the firm pays dividend of $5.
If dividend of $5 is not paid (The value of D = 0)
P1 = P (1+E)-D
P1 = 100 (1+10) - 0
P1 = 110
So, the market price of the share is expected to be $110, if the firm does not pay the dividend of 5$.
Stability of Dividends: Another important implication of dividend policy is the stability of dividends that is how stable and regular the dividends are paying out. It is said that generally the shareholders favor stable dividends and those dividends which have prospects of steady upward growth.
So, while designing a dividend policy for the firm, it is also to be considered as to whether the firm will have a consistency in dividend payments or the dividends will fluctuate from one year to another.
Firms should maintain constant DP ratio (Dividend Payout Ratio)
A firm may have a policy of distributing a fixed percentage of earnings as dividends to its shareholders. The higher the profits will result in higher absolute dividends while lower the earnings will result in lower absolute amount of dividends.
For Example: A firm having the dividends payout ratio of 60% will distribute 6 hundred thousand dollars for a profit of $ 1million and it will distribute $ 2, 40,000 only if the profits are $ 4, 00,000 and so on...
Thus, the percentage of the dividend rate or dividend per share may fluctuate from year to year depending upon the earnings of the firm.
Optimal Capital Structure: Even though Modigliani-Miller Model says that there is nothing like Optimal Capital Structure, but the non-traditional methods say that a firm can attain profits only by implementing Optimal Capital Structure.
Some firms adopt this capital structure to minimize the risk, flexibility on the investments and the profitability.
The finance manager should be able to identify that optimal point (profit point) for the firm precisely, but not to attempt to track the optimal range for the capital structure.
Optimal Capital Structure differs from different firms, Existing Firm and a New Firm.
For Example: Existing Firm may require additional capital funds for meeting the requirements of growth, expansion, and diversification or even for working capital management. The decision for a particular source of funds is to be taken in the totality of capital structure, i.e. in the light of the resultant capital structure after the proposed issue of capital or debt.
The Capital Structure of the new firm is designed in the initial stages of the firm and the financial manager has to take care if many considerations, the present capital structure be designed in the light of a future target capital structure. Future plans, growth and diversifications strategies should be considered and factored in the analysis, so optimal capital structure greatly influences the dividend policy of any firm, depending upon there capital structure.
Broadly speaking the dividend policy can be determined by two basic analyses required to find the valuation of the proposed capital structure of the firm, i.e. one from the point of view of profitability and another from view of liquidity.
Capital structure will always determine the profits of the firm and the development of the firm. Equity and Debt capital are well managed by the capital structure of the firm. A well designed capital structure will have a very good impact on the dividend policy of the company.
NO EXPERTISE IN OTHER 2 QUESTIONS