Islam/concept of tawheed in Islam
First I would like to apologize to you if anywhere i have sounded rude in the previous answers. This is also contrary to the teachings of Islam.
Kindly see my answers below for your queries:
• The reason why I am asking is because sometimes Muslims say the word 'Trinity' is not in the Bible. I thought the same is also applicable to the word 'Tawhid' which is not find as such in the Quran.
• Concept of Tawheed in Islam
The Word Tawheed is derivative of three consonants root w-h-d, which serves as the vehicle for the basic concept of ‘oneness,’ or ‘unity,” along with the closely related ideas of ‘singularity’ and ‘uniqueness.’ These root letters are clearly apparent in the numerical adjective wahid [one]. In the words of the Qur`an:
(37:4) inna Ilaaha-kum-la-Wahid :- Your God is surely One;
(112:1) khul huwalla-hu ahad:- Say “He is Allah, the One and Unique;
• About the chapter in the Quran called Tawhid: Which Surah number do you refer to?
Surah 112, Al Ikhlas (also called as tawhid / unity/ purity)
• Were the names of the Surahs also inspired by Allah?
Yes, the names as well as the chronological order was inspired by Allah to the
• Since you seem to know Islam well, may I ask you to have a look at the following short article at the end of this message on the subject of animal sacrifice for the forgiveness of sin, very frequently mentioned in the Torah and Zabur.
I am just in the beginner level.
• The Muslim is sacrificing his desires continuously to please Allah, which is harder than sacrificing an animal. He is also seeking forgiveness from the Almighty constantly. He is praying the five times prescribed prayers, fasting
In the month of Ramadan, paying the obligatory charity (zakath) as well as the voluntary (charity), performing Hajj (atleast once in liftetime for those who are financially able),etc.. and doing plenty of good deeds, these all helps in seeking forgiveness from Allah.
• Since the Quran is supposed to confirm previous Scriptures what happened to this concept?
Definitely Quran confirms the previous scriptures as revealed to previous prophets. But it also says they were tampered over a period of time by priest and rabbis for worldly gains. Therefore we do believe in them, but we do not follow the previous scriptures, nor confirm anything in it, nor deny anything in it and we leave the matter to God and his apostles. Anyway, after the Quran and Shariah law was revealed to the Prophet all the previous books and scriptures has become obsolete. Thus, following Quran becomes obligatory.
Other answers will follow inshallah;
Thank you for your message. In situation like this I follow the example of my Lord Jesus Christ who prayed,'Father forgive them because they do not know what they are doing.' :-)
About Tawheed, is it true that the actual Arabic of Surah 112, verse 1 does not say that Allah is One, but literally says Allah is One of? Is this due to the word used for one in the sentence, namely ahad? Here is a transliteration of the Arabic text of the Quran: Qul huwa Allahu ahad(un), which literally means:
"Say: He, Allah, is one of."
If that is correct then why is this verse falsley translated? I am sure you agree that Tauhiyd comes from the verb wahhad WHICH LITERALLY MEANS TO UNITE. In Islamic terminology, it means to realize and maintain the unity of Allâh in one's actions (inwardly and outwardly). The questions arise, 'Allah is one of what and united with whom? Please clarify.
About the previous scriptures emphasis on animal sacrifice for the forgiveness of sin symbollically pointing to the prefect sacrifice in Jesus: The question is not what is harder but what did God command. Clearly, He did command those sacrifices. Leviticus, one of the books of the Torah is totally devoted to that subject. If the Quran did not bring a new religion what happened to taht major part of the previous one?
You say that the previous Scriptures where tampererd with and became obsolete. Where does it say that in the Quran? Please bring evidence in the light of the following verses in the Quran mentioned below. Thank you and kind regards,
Should Muslims read the Tawrat, Zabur and Injeel?
'Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel.'
Surah 5, Al Ma'idah, verse 47
What are the Tawrat, Zabur and Injeel?
Muslims are commanded in the Quran to believe in the books God revealed to the Jews and the Christians. A few such verses from the Quran confirm what the Bible teaches. They are here quoted because all truth belongs to God. This principle allows for referring to truth contained in any publications without giving them a status of perfection.
The Tawrat is the Arabic equivalent of the Hebrew word ‘Torah’. It is normally understood as the law that was revealed to Hazrat Musa. However, the Tawrat also includes the rest of the books that are found in today’s, 21st century Bible, the Old Testament, for the following reasons:
1. The Jews themselves use the term, ‘Tawrat’ sometimes in a general sense to include Jewish Scirptures in its entirety.
2. Jesus and his followers sometimes used the words, “law” and “prophets” interchangeably to refer to the whole Old Testament. When the Quran tells the Jews to follow the Tawrat, it must be doing so in the light of both, the narrow and the wider sense of how it was defined at that time by the Jews. If that was not the case it would have had to make it clear in order to not mislead them.
3. The Quran mentions that Muslims also have to believe in, ‘...that which the Prophets received from their Lord.’ Some of them are identified as Job, Solomon, Jonah, Ezekiel or possibly Isaiah and Ezra. These are biblical prophets whose books are most likely referred to as the Scripture that were taught to Jesus. They are not lost but found in the Torah, sometimes defined in the wider sense as the Old Testament.
1. ‘Zabur’ is the Arabic equivalent of the Hebrew word ‘zimra’, translated as ‘psalm.‘ It has the meaning ‘song, music.‘ When the Quran mentions the Zabur, it is probably a reference to the third division of the Hebrew Scriptures, known as ‘the Writings‘, or ‘Kethubim‘, beginning with the book of Psalms. The other two divisions are the Torah and the ‘Nevi'im‘ (Prophets). They have been recognized by Jews since about 450 BC until today. Jesus and the early church fathers also refer to the same divisions.
2. When the Quran mentions the revelations given to the people of the book, the Jews and the Christians , it normally refers to the Tawrat and the Injeel, not to the Zabur. That book, however, was also revealed by God to the Jewish prophet Hazrat Dawud . This indicates that it was included in the Tawrat as used in the wider sense of the word. Such a conclusion is supported by a hadith that tells of a similar occasion. Ka'b al-Ahbar is reported as quoting the Tawrat with sayings that find their parallels in the book of Isaiah (chapter 42) rather than the books revealed to Hazrat Musa. Isaiah is part of the Nevi'im (Prophets) the second division of the Hebrew Bible.
The Injil is the Arabic equivalent of the Greek word ‘euaggelion’. It is normally understood as the Gospel of Hazrat Isa written in Greek, the trade language of that part of the Roman Empire in the first century AD. However, the Injil also includes the rest of the books that are found in today’s, 21st century New Testament of the Bible for the following reasons:
1. “Injil” or, “Gospel” occurs about 77 times in the New Testament. The message in it, whether spoken or written, is called “the Gospel” . Hazrat Isa committed his Injil into the hands of his followers to publish throughout the world. Various historical documents clearly show that the early church used the word "Gospel" as a title for all or part of the New Testament before Islam arrived.
2. Toward the end of the second century, Irenaeus wrote: "The Word gave to us the Gospel in a fourfold shape, but held together by one Spirit". In the fourth century AD, Chrysostom wrote, “We assert, therefore, that, although a thousand Gospels were written, if the contents of all were the same, they would still be one, and their unity no wise infringed by the number of writers. -- Whence it is clear that the four Gospels are one Gospel; for, as the four say the same thing, its oneness is preserved by the harmony of the contents, and not impaired by the difference of persons”
3. F.F Bruce, Rylands Professor of Biblical Criticism and Exegesis at the University of Manchester, England, wrote: “At a very early date it appears that the four Gospels were united in one collection. They must have been brought together very soon after the writing of the Gospel according to John. This fourfold collection was originally known as "The Gospel" in the singular, not "The Gospels" in the plural; there was only one Gospel... Ignatius, bishop of Antioch, refers to "The Gospel" as an authoritative writing, and as he knew more than one of the four "Gospels" it may well be that by "The Gospel" sans phrase he means the fourfold collection which went by that name.”
About other books in the New Testament Bruce writes: “The corpus Paulinum, or collection of Paul's writings, was brought together about the same time as the collecting of the fourfold Gospel. As the Gospel collection was designated by the Greek word Euangelion, so the Pauline collection was designated by the one word Apostolos...
Augustine, one of the most famous early church fathers wrote in the fourth century, "For I ask them, is it good to take pleasure in reading the Apostle? or good to take pleasure in a sober Psalm? or good to discourse on the Gospel? They will answer to each, 'It is good'."
4. A Hadith of great reliability shows that the prophet of Islam credited wahi (Divine Inspiration) to one of the Apostle Paul's writings: “Abu Huraira told that after God's messenger had stated that God most high has said, "I have prepared for my upright servants what eye has not seen, nor ear heard, nor has entered into the heart of man," he added, "Recite, if you wish, 'No soul knows what comfort has been concealed for them'." (Bukhari and Muslim)
This is close to what Paul wrote in 1 Corinthians 2:9, a book that is part of today’s New Testament: ‘But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that love him.’
Christian theologian B.B. Warfield sums up the whole topic under discussion well when he writes: “The earliest name given to this new section of Scripture was framed on the model of the name by which what we know as the Old Testament was then known. Just as it was called "The Law and the Prophets and the Psalms" (or "the Hagiographa"), or more briefly "The Law and the Prophets," or even more briefly still "The Law"; so the enlarged Bible was called "The Law and the Prophets, with The Gospels and the Apostles" (so Clement of Alexandria, "Strom." vi. 11, 88; Tertullian, "De Præs. Hær." 36), or most briefly "The Law and the Gospel" (so Claudius Apolinaris, Irenæus); while the new books apart were called "The Gospel and the Apostles," or most briefly of all "The Gospel." This earliest name for the new Bible, with all that it involves as to its relation to the old and briefer Bible, is traceable as far back as Ignatius (A.D. 115), who makes use of it repeatedly (e.g., "ad Philad." 5; "ad Smyrn." 7).
Have the Tawrat, Zabur and Injil been corrupted?
If a corruption of the texts had occurred one needs to ask the questions, ‘when should it have happened, how and by whom? What exactly has been distorted and why?’ There must be a reason behind such a deception. What would be the advantage or benefit from it? Muslims best look up their Quran to find out what it says about such serious charges.
1. Surah 2 , Al Bagaraah, verses 41-42, 44:
And believe in what I have sent down [= the Qur’ān], confirming what is with you [= the Tawrāt (Torah) and the Injīl (Gospel)], and do not be the first to disbelieve in it, and do not buy with My Verses [= the Tawrāt (Torah) and the Injīl (Gospel)] a small price, and fear Me and Me Alone. And do not clothe the truth with falsehood, or hide the truth – and you know.... Do you order the people in righteousness and you yourselves forget? And are you reciters of the Book? Do you not understand?
According to Tafsīr at-Tabarī, “what is with you” is the Tawrāt [Torah] and the Injīl [Gospel].
“What is with you” is described as “My Verses”, the ones of Allāh Himself. It is not possible that the Qur’ān could be confirming as God’s Word (“My Verses”) a text which has been changed. Neither is it possible to hide the truth if one does not have it any longer, or to recite books they allegedly no longer have.
Ibn Isaaq, the earliest biographer of Muhammad comments on Verse 44: ‘... do not conceal the knowledge which you have about my apostle and what he has brought you when you will find it with you in what you know of the books which are in your hands .... would you forbid men to disbelieve in the prophecy you have ... you contradict what you know to be in My book.
2. Surah 10, Yunus, verse 94:
'And if thou wert in doubt as to what We have revealed unto thee, then ask those who have been reading the book from before thee..'
‘Those who have been reading, ‘the book from before thee' are Jews and Christians! It would make no sense for Allah to command doubters to ask people for guidance whose Scriptures had been corrupted! Several verses in the Quran bear witness to the truth that the Tawrat was unchanged at the time of Hazrat Isa.
Numerous verses attest to the truth that the Tawrat was uncorrupted in the time of Muhammad, the sixth century AD. The Arabic phrase 'bain yadaihi' which is used in these references to the Torah literally means 'between his hands.' This usually is an idiom for 'in his possession,' or 'at his disposal'. Some Jewish contemporaries of Muhammad are called 'those who guide and do justice in the light of truth,' besides many others whose reputation was not so favourable. The very fact that they were commended so highly shows that they were in possession of the uncorrupted Torah.
3. Surah 3, Ali 'Imran, verse 93:
'…Say, 'Bring ye the Law and study it, if ye be men of truth.'
In this specific incident the Jews are asked to bring their own Law, the Tawrat. They are commanded by God to study it in order to find the right answer to a particular question.
4. Surah 5, Al Ma'idah, verse 43:
'But why do they come to thee for decision, when they have (their own) Law before them? -Therein is the (plain) command of Allah;....
Maududi comments on this verse: '...sometimes, when their own law did not suit them, they would take their cases to the Holy Prophet in the hope that they might obtain a more favourable decree from him than they could from their own law.'
This shows clearly that even corrupted Jews would never change the written Tawrat! They were only prepared to conceal the meaning of it. In spite of their wickedness, they did not dare to change the written form of the Tawrat! That is why, according to the Quran, Allah told them to look up their own law in which is the plain command of God!
5. Surah 5, Al Ma'idah, verse 47
'Let the People of the Gospel judge by what Allah hath revealed therein. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) those who rebel.'
This command is given to Muhammad's contemporaries. It is written in the 'present' tense which in the Arabic language can also refers to the future! If the Gospel (Injil) was corrupted at that time then surely Allah would never have asked the people of the Gospel, the Christians, to believe in it!
How can the “People of the Injīl” be expected to “judge” by what Allāh had revealed in it if it had been changed before the provision of the Qur’ān?
Some might argue that only some of the Injīl is God’s Word, but not all of it. However, this would still make it impossible for people to “judge” by it because they would not know which parts provide a reliable basis for judgment.
Ibn Ishaq tells us, that the prophet of Islam was delighted that he abided by the Torah in making his decision when the Jews did not: "I am the first to revive the order of God and His Book and to practice it"
6. Surah 5, Al Ma'idah, verse 69:
'If only they had stood fast by the Law, the Gospel, and all the revelation that was sent to them from their Lord, they would have enjoyed happiness from every side. There is from among them a party on the right course...'
Ibn Ishaq comments: [Four Jews came to Muhammad and said]: "Do you not allege that you follow the religion of Abraham and believe in the Torah which we have and testify that it is the truth from God?" He replied, "Certainly, but you have sinned and broken the covenant contained therein and concealed what you were ordered to make plain to men, and I dissociate myself from your sin." They said, "We hold by what we have. We live according to the guidance and the truth and we do not believe in you and we will not follow you." So God sent down concerning them: "Say, O scripture folk, you have no standing until you observe the Torah and the Gospel and what has been sent down to you from your Lord ...."
Furthermore, the fact that there were Jews and Christians 'on the right course' in Muhammad's time confirms the Torah and the Gospel to be unchanged in the 6th century AD! Certainly, they could never have been described in such an honourable way if they had 'stood fast' by corrupted Holy Books!
7. Surah 5, Al Ma'idah, verse 68
'Say: O People of the Book! Ye have no ground to stand upon unless ye stand fast by the Law, the Gospel and all the revelation that has come to you from your Lord....'
8. Surah 10, Junus, verse 64
'No change can there be in the Words of Allah. This is indeed the supreme Felicity.'
Since the Tawrat and the Injil are words of Allah it is impossible for man to change them. God has the power to watch over His word and to preserve it.
9. Surah 2, Al Bagaraah, verse 1:
That is the book; in it is guidance sure, without doubt, those those who fear Allah.
The usual translation “This is the book,…” is wrong. The pronoun, ‘dhālika’ in Arabic points to a thing in some distance, not at hands. Consequently the Koran does not refer to itself, but to a book that came before it. That is the Bible.
WHAT ABOUT ‘TAHRIF’?
The Arabic word used by Muslim scholars to describe the supposed corruption of the sacred Scriptures is ‘Tahrif’. A distinction is made by them between a corruption of meaning or of words. All the most celebrated among the earliest commentators on the Quran speak only about the first corruption of meaning. Contrary to these authorities modern Muslim commentators hold the view that only parts of the Bible remained unchanged. Faith is only put in those statements which are supposed to confirm one's own opinions. Some Jews did the same in the days of Muhammad. They were condemned for doing so . There is no reason why that judgement for such a view should not apply anymore today.
DOES QURAN SAY THE BIBLE HAS CHANGED?
The Quran nowhere explicitly states the Injil (Gospel) was changed! What about the Tawrat? History shows that whenever God revealed Himself, most of His people fell into disobedience after a period of time. So it was with the Jews. In spite of this sad fact states there were always good Jews who remain true to the book God gave them:
'Of the people of Moses there is a section who guide and do justice in the light of truth.' God's word is truth and good Jews surely would never have changed the meaning or even the words of their Holy Book! (Surah 7, Al A'raf, verse 159)
1. Surah 3, Ali 'Imran, verse 78
'There is among them a section who distort the Book with their tongues: (as they read) you would think it is a part of the Book, but it is no part of the Book; and they say, 'That is from Allah,' but it is not from Allah: It is they who tell a lie against Allah...'
In the verse quoted above the Jews are reading parts of their Book wrongly while the written words remain unchanged. This is confirmed by the Tafsir of Ibn Kathir:
‘Al-Bukhari reported that Ibn 'Abbas said that the Ayah means they alter and add although none among Allah's creation CAN REMOVE THE WORDS OF ALLAH FROM HIS BOOKS, THEY ALTER AND DISTORT THEIR APPARENT MEANINGS. Wahb bin Munabbih said, "The Tawrah and Injil REMAIN AS ALLAH REVEALED THEM, AND NO LETTER IN THEM WAS REMOVED. However, the people misguide others by addition and false interpretation, relying on books that they wrote themselves." Then, they say: "This is from Allah," but it is not from Allah; As for Allah's books, THEY ARE STILL PRESERVED AND CANNOT BE CHANGED." Ibn Abi Hatim recorded this statement…
2. Surah 5, Al Ma'idah, verse 13
'But because of their breach of their Covenant, We cursed them, and made their hearts grow hard: They change the words from their (right) places and forget a good part of the Message that was sent...
The meaning of the phrase, 'They change the words from their (right) places,' occurs also in Surah 5:41and is explained by Ibn Ishaq:
‘[A Jewish couple were caught in adultery. Some rabbis sent them and other Jews to Muhammad saying, if he prescribes tajbih (a lesser form of punishment) he is a king and follow him, but if he prescribes stoning he is a prophet. The apostle then went to the rabbis and asked them to bring out their learned men. He then asked] Abdullah b. Suriya, ... the most learned man living in the Torah ... as to whether the Torah did not prescribe stoning for adulterers. "Yes," he said, .... Then he [Muhammad] said: "They change words from their places, saying, If this be given to you receive it, and if it is not given to you, i.e. the stoning, beware of it, ..."
When the apostle gave judgment about them he asked for a Torah. A rabbi sat there reading it having put his hand over the verse of stoning. `Abdullah b. Salam struck the rabbi's hand, saying, "This, O prophet of God, is the verse of stoning which he refuses to read to you." The apostle said, "Woe to you Jews! What has induced you to abandon the judgement of God which you hold in your hands?" They answered: "The sentence used to be carried out until a man of royal birth and noble origin committed adultery and the King refused to allow him to be stoned. Later another man committed adultery and the king wanted him to be stoned but they said No, not until you stone so-and-so. And when they said that to him they agreed to arrange the matter by tajbih and they did away with all mention of stoning." The apostle said: "I am the first to revive the order of God and His book and to practise it." They were duly stoned ...
Furthermore, the phrase about changing the word from its right places confirms the Torah that was available at that time to have been correct. To know the difference between right and wrong words of God presupposes to have the right version in one’s possession. Hence the Jews only changed the wording of it when dealing with Muslims or Muhammad.
3. Surah 2, Al Baqarah, verses 75-85
Here is what Ibn Ishaq, the earliest biographer of Muhammad had to say about the passage:
Verse 75: "who listen to the word of God ... the Torah" [refers to the event mentioned in verse 55 where some Jewish leaders told Moses they wanted to hear God when He spoke to him. Moses took them up on to the mountain and they heard and understood God's voice]. Then he went back with them to the Children of Israel and when he came to them a party of them changed the commandments they had been given; and when Moses said to the Children of Israel, ‘God has ordered you to do so and so,’ they contradicted him and said God had ordered something else. It is they to whom God refers.
Thus God blamed them for what they were doing, He having in the Torah prohibited them from shedding each other's blood and charged them to redeem their prisoners ... they [two Jewish tribes] shed each other's blood while the Torah was in their hands by which they knew what was allowed and what was forbidden them ... When the war came to an end they ransomed their prisoners in accordance with the Torah ... God said in blaming them for that: ‘Will you believe in a part of the scripture and disbelieve in another part?’ [2:85] i.e. would you redeem him in accordance with the Torah and kill him when the Torah forbids you to do so ... (2:83-86)
4. Surah 4, Al Nisa, verse 46
The Jews are accused of changing, writing down wrongly, what Muhammad (p.b.u.h.) said. This is confirmed by the following hadith collected by Bukhari:
...No one removes the works of one of the Books of Allah Almighty, but they twist them, interpreting them improperly....
In Surah 2:2. The usual translation “This is the book – no doubt in it …” of “dhālika l-kitāb lā rayba fīhi …” is wrong. The pronoun dhālika, according to the grammar of Classical Arabic, refers to a distant object, and the verse must be translated “That is the book …”.
Thererfore, the Koran in this verse cannot refer to itself, but to something different, the Holy Bilbe!
In Surah 5, Al Ma'idah, verse 48, the Quran is spoken of as confirming the Scripture that was before it and as a watcher over it. The Arabic meaning of the word "watch" (Muhaimin) can also be rendered "one who safeguards", "stands witness", "preserves" and "upholds". This clearly contradicts the view that the revelations given to the prophet of Islam allegedly abrogated the Bible! If this were the case there would be no need to confirm the Torah and the Gospel or even to watch over them in such a determined way.
The Quran makes it clear that the Tawrat, Zabur and Injil have not been changed before the time of Muhammad. Otherwise God would have demanded to believe in and follow Scriptures that were already corrupted. If we assume that changes were made during or after the prophet's time, we can simply compare a twenty first century copy with one that was written before the sixth century. The result will be that all the teaching remained the same! Muslims who say that the Bible is corrupted contradict their own book. Therefore, follow the advice of the Prophet of Islam when he said, ‘seek knowledge from the cradle to the grave’, by learning what the Torah and the Injil say.