You are here:

Jehovah`s Witness/Christendom Hates God's Name - Jehovah!


Brother Rando,

The JW Expert impostor (DH) asked the following questions:

>> "1.  If Christendom hates it, then why is it that it was “Christendom” that wrote this song to begin with?

2.  If Christendom hates it, then why is it that “Christendom” has been singing this song in their churches, for years?

3.  If Christendom hates it, then why is it that just an objective watching of the many videos available of “Christendom” singing this song, shows NOBODY “hating” it, but rather rejoicing in it?

4.  Since I am pretty much regarded (falsely so) among some of the JWs here as one who “hates Jehovah’s name”, why is it that I would love this song so much?" <<<


Christendom loves God's name so much? Wow, that's news to me. If this is true why is it then the MAJORITY of their Bibles, ESPECIALLY the KJV and its revised versions NJKV doesn't have it in ALL 7000+ locations?


Christendom loves God's name so much? If so why do their preachers, their teachers opposed using it in their Bibles?

For example, here's just one bold statement or rather an invalid pathetic excuse of why we can't use God's name  - Jehovah.

>>"#2.2 Conclusion: God's Name is not Jehovah

In conclusion, this study has not proved what the correct pronunciation of God's name was in the Old Testament. LORD was a substitute, Jehovah is definitely wrong, and the alternatives left are Yahweh, Yahveh, Yāhūh, Yāhôh, or perhaps even something else. We have not proved any of these with any certainty yet, but we can go on to prove that God's name as the tetragammaton YHWH (or YHVH) is Yahweh. In the New Testament we are not told to use God's Old Testament covenant name when we pray or worship. Actually we have a quote of Jesus reading from Isaiah where he read, "The spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to preach the gospel to the poor," (Luke 4:18). This is a quotation of, "The spirit of the Lord GOD is upon me, because the LORD has anointed me to preach good tidings to the poor." (Isaiah 61:1 KJV). Here the Hebrew for "Lord GOD" is "adonai YHWH" and the Hebrew word for "LORD" is "YHWH". The Greek equivalent used for "Lord GOD" in Luke is "kuriou", which means "Lord". Now why didn't Jesus read both words? Either he left out YHWH altogether, or he left out "adonai" and God inspired the substitution of "kurios" for YHWH. He also refused to quote God's name YHWH a second time, and used the word "he" instead. Jesus refused to say God's name in Matthew 4:7 where he is quoting Deuteronomy 6:16 and YHWH was used. Also in Matthew 4:10 he refused to use God's name again where he is quoting Deuteronomy 6:13 and 10:20, where again YHWH is used. Again in Matthew 23:39 he had opportunity to use God's name when quoting Psalm 118:26 but God inspired the use of "kurios" instead. Why did Jesus continually refuse to use God's name when he had the opportunity if it was so important to use the name? These New Testament quotations are inspired by God (2 Timothy 3:16), so whichever way you look at it he had the opportunity to pronounce the name and he didn't do it. If saying God's actual name was not important to Jesus, then why should it be so important to us? Jesus told us to pray to "the Father" (Matthew 6:9; Luke 11:2; John 16:23), and worship "the Father" (John 4:23). Jesus always called God his Father, and with his spirit in every born again Christian, we ought to do the same (Galatians 4:6)."<<

There's so much falsehood in the above quote but the fact remains the same, Christendom hates the name Jehovah. Otherwise, they would have updated all their Bibles and put back God's name Jehovah (or Yahweh if they prefer) in its proper place.

Imagine that, this Christendom teacher actually said:

"If saying God's actual name was not important to Jesus, then why should it be so important to us? Jesus told us to pray to "the Father" (Matthew 6:9; Luke 11:2; John 16:23), and worship "the Father" (John 4:23). Jesus always called God his Father, and with his spirit in every born again Christian, we ought to do the same (Galatians 4:6)."

Funny thing also is that, whenever they use Jehovah, they are NOT referring to the ONLY ONE TRUE God that Jesus Christ's calls his God and Father, but Jesus Christ himself. To Christendom, Jehovah is another name for Jesus Christ. i.e Trinity godhead.

In fact, this impostor JW Expert now claims that the Trinity godhead's name is tada.... Jehovah.

To quote:

>>"In fact, my position has been from day one, that Jehovah is the name of the Triune God.  That’s only been stated about 10,000 times now."<<

Now isn't this interesting brother Rando? You've been asking for the name of the Trinity godhead and never gotten one, until now.

Finally he had to admit: "Jehovah is the name of the Triune God".

So if the "Triune God" is Jehovah, who then is the "Great I AM"?

If the "Triune God" is Jehovah, who then the Triune God the Father? Is it Jehovah also?

Now how does this work?

As for the claim that they have it in their hymns then WHY NOT put it in all their publications and maybe mention it in their sermons?

Why is it that, ONLY very few individuals in Christendom knew and used God's name Jehovah - as the Creators name?

Why is it that, ONLY very few individuals in Christendom knew that Jehovah is Jesus Christ's God and Father's name?

Because as a whole, Christendom HATES God's name Jehovah. Simple as that. Their teachers, pastors, deacons, priests as a group conditioned their members NOT to use Jehovah as the name of the ONLY True God but another name of Jesus Christ - hence the name of the Triune God.

(just Google "Jesus is Jehovah" / "Jehovah is Jesus" and you'll see what I mean)

Thoughts brother Rando?

Members of Christendom are trying to mimic "Christianity".  Christendom is Satan's Religious Kingdom Opposing Jehovah's Universal Sovereignty and rejects Jesus as the Christ.  If you put the Trinity Doctrine into Scripture, the Scripture will nullify the man-made Trinity Doctrine.

Put the Trinity into John 1:1.  Trinitarians nullify their own doctrine by claiming it had a Beginning.  Logic would tell us if something has a Beginning, then it was Created, therefore nullifying that the trinity always had existed.  John 1:1 doesn't state that the Word always existed.  It tells us the complete opposite.  "In the Beginning was the Word."

Then again, the trinity doctrine specifies that "nothing within the trinity has a Beginning." Uh oh!!  Why would a trinitarian use (John 1:1) to prove that it's god has a Beginning, when the trinity claims the three parts are co-equal without a Beginning??

Trinitarians claim Jesus is the (I AM).  Their definition is that the (I AM) is God.   If there is only One God, then why do they teach Three (I AM's)???  How can the second god (I AM) be the (Great I AM) almighty god, if the second (I AM) god is equal to the First (I AM) god and the Third (I AM) god??  Shouldn't the trinity say there are Three I Am's (Gods) that make up One Great I AM (Almighty God)???  But they actually teach THREE ALMIGHTY GODS!!  Guess what folks, The trinity makes no mention of (I AM).  The trinity hoax exposed!

Christendom claims that it's god will torment you in a eternal burning hell because he refuses to give you "grace".  Isn't "grace" unconditional???  Meaning "no works or deeds" are involved or necessary??  Isn't that what Christendom teaches??  A LIE???  They deny that anyone can be resurrected because Jesus never really died for our sins?? Christendom teaches when you die you go to an eternal burning hell?? Jesus never taught the he burns people! (John 5:28-29)

Then how come people come out of this inescapable place of eternal torment??  Because the "ransom sacrifice" is more powerful than Derrick Holland's lies.  Read it for yourself.  "hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works." (Rev 20:13)

SO Christendom teaches that the "ransom sacrifice" of Jesus Christ is worthless since people go to an eternal burning hell for all eternity.  Trinitarians are good at only one thing.  That's lying!  Jesus never died, they say, he and the evildoer went to heaven on the day they were to die.  Some trinitarians are even more sinister by claiming Jesus and the evildoer went to "a burning hell" .   The scriptures don't state, "today you will be with me in hell" folks!! And these "charlatans" call themselves "Christian".

Well, well, since hell is an inescapable place of torment by Derrick Holland's definition, then can we conclude that Jesus Christ is still torturing the evildoer?   Isn't that his teaching??   How come Holland claims "Jesus is God".  Which God tortures people by burning them alive forever and ever never letting them die but keeping them alive in a hideous place that is inescapable???  Jesus Christ burns people forever Holland??    

If "Jesus is God" then can we conclude that Jesus is made up of "three separate persons"??  If Jehovah is the Triune God then can we conclude that Jehovah is made up of "three separate persons"?? SO there is two trinities, two almighty gods??  666 not 333????  Can we have the names of these {six} parts??  PLEASE.

Can you show us the trinity doctrine that Names it's parts?  How about the Trinity being itself??  How come (Jehovah, Jesus Christ, Son of Man, Messiah, Lord, Almighty God, I AM,) are completely absent from the trinity doctrine???

Holland claims deleting God's Name some 7,000 times from the KJV is inspired of God???  Isn't the {KJV} a realization of prophecy??  AN eureka or "ah ha" moment??  "And it opened its mouth in blasphemies against God to blaspheme his name and his dwelling place, even those residing in heaven." (Rev 13:6)

Trinitarian teaching Modalism...

Take Care,
Brother Rando  

Jehovah`s Witness

All Answers

Answers by Expert:

Ask Experts


Brother Rando


Brother Rando is a student of Prophecy and one of Jehovah's Witnesses in good standing with the Faithful and Discreet slave. His interests are directed towards how the time of the end would come about. The earth’s population today is going through a physical, spiritual and emotional tribulation that has been prophesied concerning a time of distress as it enters into a cleansing period of removing wickedness by means of God’s Kingdom. (Daniel 12:1) Brother Rando’s discussions are of keen interest to many who await for God's Kingdom. He asserts that his discussions are just that, and not Prophecies, nor does he make the claim to be inspired. His authority is the Bible. He proclaims the year 2034 to be of very high interest to all. Like a GPS, that gives Insight to location, 2034 allows us to gauge where we are in the stream of time according to God’s Will. According to Brother Rando, the Bible carries two thoughts in it’s passages, one is fleshy and the other is spiritual. Jesus Christ warned Peter of thinking fleshy and that this type of thinking is not from God. (Matthew 16:23) In order to measure time, a method of measurement is needed. Measuring time by “the day” would mean a 24 hour period. However, measuring “the day” spiritually would mean a period of time yet to be revealed using other scripture to interpret the method needed. By looking into the Bible, we can actually determine what God meant by “the day” when looking into his Word on how his Will would come about. As we read (Genesis 2:16-17) the punishment for disobedience was death “in the day”. As time went on, the scriptures do begin to reveal the time frame of “the day”. According to Genesis 5:5, Adam lived 930 years and then he died. Satan who thinks like a man, got it wrong! (Genesis 3:4-5) Why Study the Bible


In Brother Rando’s research of the Bible, he found scripture does interpret other scripture. The answer to how long a day was, according to God’s Will was found in Psalms 90:4 and 2 Peter 3:8. This is vital to gaining understanding in how we are to measure time in God’s view. Spiritually and not fleshy or physical. A day in heavens time is a thousand years to us. It’s by this method we can measure time and where we are in the stream of time of the end. In answer Jesus said to them: “Break down this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.” (John 2:19) Was Jesus indicating that he was the Temple of God, God’s Kingdom? And that the temple would in fact be destroyed or broken down? According to God’s Word, the following scripture is the basis for Salvation. “For if you publicly declare that ‘word in your own mouth,’ that Jesus is Lord, and exercise faith in your heart that God raised him up from the dead, you will be saved.” (Romans 10:9) In order for John 2:19 and Romans 10:9 to come in line, did Jesus utter a prophecy about God's Kingdom since he stated, “I will raise it up”? IF the basis for salvation is that Jesus is Lord and that God raised him up. We can conclude that Jesus did not raise himself up, but it was God that raised him from the dead since he was dead and conscious of nothing at all. (Ecc 9:5) Jesus prophesied that HE would raise God's Kingdom. (Rev 5:10) Jesus was speaking prophetically of raising the temple within the third day of a thousand years. Jesus warned Peter not to think the thoughts of man. (Matthew 16:23) Based on 2 Peter 3:8 we are able to determine the time frame to when God’s Kingdom would be raised up by Jesus Christ. Jesus was put to death on Nisan 14, 33CE. The two days would actually represent two thousand years and we come up with the year 2033. Jesus stated,“in three days I will raise it up.” So the third day is upon us in 2034.

“I fully support, acknowledge and cooperate with *The Faithful Steward and Its' Governing Body* of Jehovah’s Witnesses.” I am property of the "Faithful and Discreet Slave" that Jesus, my brother, is appointing over his belongings. This Slave is the Governing Body of Jehovah's Earthly Organization known Worldwide as "Jehovah's Witnesses". When the Mountain-like organizations act against God's chosen people after Babylon has been destroyed, Jehovah will slaughter those who are touching the pupils of his eyes. Even though Babylon the Great is spoken as a woman and she has fallen in (Rev. 14:8), the sacred secret is that she is not a woman at all, but the World of False Religion that will be utterly destroyed by the personal hand of Jesus Christ as (King Abaddon) in the coming Great Tribulation never to be found again! (Matthew 24:14)

Secular Historians point to the Temple in Jerusalem being destroyed in 70 AD by the Romans. But was Jesus Christ speaking in a physical sense since that Temple is non-existent today? Jehovah Witnesses assert that Jesus under inspiration of Holy Spirit was actually prophesying about his spiritual body as the only means to approach his Heavenly Father. (John 14:6) Not the Temple made by hands or his fleshy body as Christendom claims, but his spiritual body, known as the Body of Christ. (1 Cor 12:27) This would actually be the Collective Representative of God’s Kingdom in how we can approach the One True God JEHOVAH. Brother Rando is not the first to come up with this time frame. In the first part of 1914, the Bible Students known as International Bible Students Association discussed the “time of trouble” on the printed page called The Bible Students Monthly. Early in 1914, an issue of The Bible Students Monthly was issued with the large bold heading “END OF WORLD IN 1914? Some have quoted the large headline of this tract as proof that Russell was expecting the “end of the world” in 1914. However, such neglect the subheading under the larger headline, which states: “NOT THE VIEW OF PASTOR RUSSELL NOR OF I.B.S.A.” International Bible Students Association: "Nevertheless, when viewed from God’s standpoint, we are still “shortly after” 1914. Although Russell himself did not think the time of trouble would be this long, he did allow that it could be. It is possible that the time allotted for this period is 120 years (1914+120=2034), but that these days will be “cut short” some time before they are allowed to reach their end. We do not put this forth as a “prophecy”, nor would we feel anything was wrong if 2034 came and went and nothing had happened as far the full binding of Satan and the destruction of his empire is concerned. All things are in God’s hands."

According to the discussion, 1914 represents the year that the earth would enter into a time of distress and that time limit could very well be 120 years. Which again, brings up the year 2034. The year 1914 is derived by a prophecy of the end of the Gentile times. Brother Rando insists that we should not live by a date, but to use this time to get right with God. Jesus continually pointed that the people who were on the earth when he would raise God’s Temple would be like those people in Noah’s time, taking no note. Where do the 120 years come from? If we read Genesis 6:3, most people think of this scripture in the fleshy sense of man’s lifespan. But could there be a spiritual meaning, giving those with Insight a divine warning? The Bible does say, “make secret the words and seal up the book, until the time of [the] end.” (Daniel 12:4) Could it be, this world has entered into it’s Last Days in 1914? (1 Timothy 3:1-5) Yet there is another scripture that helps us measure the time. In Ecclesiastes 6:6 it reads, “Even supposing that he has lived a thousand years twice over and yet he has not seen what is good, is it not to just one place that everyone is going?” The chapter talks about vanity and that if a person actually lived two thousand years without God’s Kingdom we are all heading to the same place. Since death was the punishment, we would need God’s Kingdom to conquer death, the place we all are heading. A thousand years twice over is two thousand years. Simple math again brings us to the time of 2034, when the second thousand years has been brought to it’s finish. Could Christ Millennial reign be from 2034 to 3034? We don’t know. Jesus stated, he would raise God’s Temple in the third day, so we can expect God's Kingdom to be fully operating sometime between the years 2034 and 3034. However, Jesus Christ was risen first thing on the very morning in the third day. Most Bible readers are in agreement that Christ does rule for a thousand years.

Awards and Honors
Armageddon is the actual cleansing of the earth from all wickedness. If in the literal sense, it would consist of angels coming down from heaven to bring death to all those rejecting the Kingdom of God. But if it is spiritual, Armageddon could very will take place without the knowledge that it is actually occurring. If this is the case, then Armageddon would commence without the knowledge that the wicked are simply dying off. There seems to be evidence in scripture to how God destroyed the forefather’s in the wilderness. They died off in the wilderness at the hand of the destroyer without knowing of such, as Paul eloquently explains in 1 Corinthians 10:1-10. If.....

©2017 All rights reserved.