Jehovah`s Witness/Gullible people will believe their own imagination.
Now to address the nonsense that I write to my self as someone else.
To recap, here's what Mr. Holland said:
"Yeah, I told you that you guys are scum, because you lie and attack. I still stand by that, but probably should have used a different term there, as well. I called you a hypocrite…you are one. I called you a liar….you’re that, too. You now are denying that you send questions to yourself, pretending to be someone else? Well, you do. Everybody has known it for a long time, Chris's question to you pointed it out, and Phillip’s writing proved it. You never said how it was that an outside questioner could have managed to quote Phillip’s paragraph VERBATIM, as it had not yet posted to the forum. The only person who had seen what Phillip said, was you. And it just “magically” appeared in a question from someone else, on the same day? "
OK - Let's address this part to show the desperation of these people (Chris, Phillip and Mr. Holland). That they will believe anything they want to believe inspite of the fact that what they think they thought they saw wasn't true.
You now are denying that you send questions to yourself, pretending to be someone else? Well, you do. Everybody has known it for a long time, Chris's question to you pointed it out, and Phillip’s writing proved it. You never said how it was that an outside questioner could have managed to quote Phillip’s paragraph VERBATIM, as it had not yet posted to the forum. The only person who had seen what Phillip said, was you. And it just “magically” appeared in a question from someone else, on the same day? "
What do you think? Did I send myself a question as someone else?
First off, for those who believe that I sent myself a question as someone else.
Well, thanks, but no thanks. I don't deserve the credit. To be able to write and speak in a very fluent manner is my dream. Unfortunately, I'm still not there yet and probably will need more time to master the language.
In fact, you Mr. Holland, have a good command of the English language and can easily differentiate those who speak and write it well. You said so yourself, "[I] don't have comprehension and my words are hard to understand". Well, I don't know about the first, but latter, I agree. Sometimes I struggle to put together sentences. So it was quite a surprised to me that I'm being accused of sending the following questions to myself.
Now, to Chris, Phillip and Mr. Holland. Judge for yourself. Is this my writing style?
>>>"Hello, I have a question about New Light. Logic would suggest that if new light is preached that is contrary to what was preached before then certainly either before or after the change/correction/new light that that/those individual(s) was/were teaching commands of men.
For instance if the Holy Ghost is no longer the Holy Ghost but now called Holy Spirit. Which doctrine would be correct, which doctrine would be a doctrine of men? The KJV states Holy Ghost, and if the KJV is errant free and infallible wouldn't this prove that Derrick Holland doesn't believe in God's Word since he uses a new term "Holy Spirit"?
Thank you and keep up the fine fight. "<<<
How would you grade the writing style? To me it's fluid not jumpy and not broken. I wish I have that writing style and fluidity. Unfortunately, I'm still, like I said, struggling to master the language, thus, my writing style is erratic and broken at times. If this not obvious to you, then you must be blind and too dumb to differentiate, because it's very obvious to me.
Now to my reply. Observe the difference in the writing style.
That's one of the most logical explanation I've ever read about "New Light".
Indeed if the "Holy Ghost" is no longer a valid title for this third person of the Trinity godhead, what then is the KJV? Was it in error when its "brilliant - spirit inspired" translators called the third person of the Trinity godhead "Holy Ghost"?
I wonder, which one is the "New Light"?
Holy Ghost or Holy Spirit?
Can't be both, can't it?
No it can't, because the "Holy Ghost" is in the "errant free" KJV. While the "Holy Spirit" is in the NKJV and other translations.
So if KJV logic dictates, "Holy Ghost" should be the correct title instead of the "Holy Spirit".
Question is, why are they not using "Holy Ghost" when referring to "Holy Spirit"?
And if they use "Holy Spirit" what then is the "Holy Ghost"?
If so then why still use the KJV?
Why not just abandon it and instead use the newer version of the KJV, the New King James Version?
Oh I see, they can't use the NKJV because its in error, while the KJV is not.
Hmmm, makes me think. Is this blasphemy calling the "Holy Ghost" a "Holy Spirit"?
If so, how dare the Bible committee changed the "Holy Ghost" into "Holy Spirit".
But let me add to this - How dare are the NKJV translators removed EASTER from the NKJV Bible?! Instead of using EASTER as it was translated in the "errant free" KJV, they changed it BACK to "PASSOVER"!
How dare they teach the "New Light"?
"Holy Spirit" for "Holy Ghost"
"PASSOVER" for "EASTER".
They should go back to the "Old Light"!!!
How dare they.
How dare Mr. Derrick Holland abandon the "spirit inspired (winkwk)" "errant free" KJV?
Why is he now referring to the "Holy Ghost" as "Holy Spirit"?
Blasphemy I say!
Can you see the BIG DIFFERENCE? If not.
Here's another from the same poster. He said:
>>""And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise." Luke 23:43
According to Derrick Holland the Baptist Doctrine is that Jesus and the Evildoer never died but went to Heaven that same day. Now Richard is claiming the Baptist Doctrine that Paradise is now Sheol/Hell when he died, and proclaimed to the imprisoned spirits while He was there??
"We believe that Jesus went to Sheol went he died (Eph. 4:8-10), proclaimed to the imprisoned spirits while He was there" (1 Peter 3:8)
This is not the same teaching Holland teaches! How can Jesus proclaim anything when he was dead? Didn't he ascend to Heaven after 40 days to preach to the angels in Tartarus in HEAVEN where these angels were in spiritual darkness as proof that he was given authority?
How long was Jesus dead? According to bother Derrick and Richard never??
Funny how Paradise is Heaven and Hell at the same time? Ridiculous! Wasn't Jesus resurrected from the dead three days later?
Is the evildoer still burning in Sheol now since HE didn't get a Resurrection?
Did Jesus trick him into going to Hell by saying Paradise??""<<
You can find my reply here: http://en.allexperts.com/q/Jehovah-s-Witness-1617/2015/2/jesus-sheol.htm
Again, you will see the difference.
Notice also, in many of my writings, I usually address Mr. Holland as Mr. Holland not Derrick Holland or Holland.
So still convinced it was me who sent the question to myself?
If you say yes, then I must be either a genius or you're so gullible enough to believe your imagination!!!!
Fortunately or unfortunately, however you see it, I wholeheartedly deny doing it.
Thanks, but no thanks.