AllExperts > Experts 
Search      
Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Jeff Coughlin
Expertise
I can answer any questions pertaining to the presidency, from the trivial to the sublime. I specialize in providing depth and perspective behind the motives and actions of the men who have occupied our nation's Chief Executive office.

Experience
I have studied the American presidency extensively for more than thirty years. I've digested the eminent biographies of each man who has held the presidency, as well as those of several who came close. I've taught and lectured on this subject extensively.

Organizations
National Information Officer's Association; International Association of FireFighters

Education/Credentials
My undergraduate work was done through the College of Wooster, in Wooster, Ohio, and through Miami University of Oxford, Ohio. My education in this field has continued unabated, albeit informally, ever since.

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Arts/Humanities > Political Science > Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics > abolishing laws

Topic: Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics



Expert: Jeff Coughlin
Date: 5/31/2008
Subject: abolishing laws

Question
If the US wanted to abolish a law or practice, for example abolish the death penalty, what branch has the power to do this? Would it be Congress, the Supreme Court, or the Executive branch? (Please excuse my ignorance)

Answer
Hi Jon,

Congress has the power to make law. Therefore, it would be Congress that would create a new law to override an established one.

That being said, our system of checks and balances allows the other branches of government to take part in this process. The Supreme Court has the ultimate authority in deciding whether or not a law is constitutional. In your example of the death penalty, the court could decide, in theory, that the death penalty is extreme and unconstitutional. It would then require a Constitutional amendment to overturn that ruling.

The executive branch has a role as well. The president can issue a "stay of execution," or even a pardon, in any particular case under federal jurisdiction. This executive order would override any other ruling in that instance. Understand, though, that the president can make a sentence more lenient - he can't make it more severe. Also, he can make an executive order stating that federal prisoners or military prisoners shall not be executed while he is president.

So the answer to your question is simple...and complex. Most matters of judgement are.  We're all ignorant, by the way. It's only the intelligent and inquisitive  who realize it and attempt to fill in the blanks.

I hope this helps. Thanks for the question.

Jeff Coughlin

Add to this Answer    Ask a Question



  Rate this Answer
   Was this answer helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

     
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.