AllExperts > Experts 
Search      

Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics

Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Michael Troy
Expertise
I can answer just about any question about U.S. Political history, Constitutional law, the legislative process, elections, etc. I specialize in Presidential and Congresitional historical trivia, but can answer more substantive questions too.

Experience
Former Staff member for a Congressman and Senator. I also worked on about 10 Congressional and Presidential campaigns (only one that won). For a short time, I worked in the legal department of the Federal Election Commission.    I have a B.A. in Political Science.

Organizations
Former LBJ Fellow (paid fellowship for Congressional Staff).
Pi Sigma Alpha (Political Science Honorary Society).

Publications
Washington Post
Washington Times

Education/Credentials
J.D. University of Michigan
B.A. George Washington University (Poli. Sci. major).

Awards and Honors
LBJ Fellow
Truman Scholar

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Arts/Humanities > Political Science > Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics > World Politics

Topic: Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics



Expert: Michael Troy
Date: 6/10/2008
Subject: World Politics

Question
What do you recommend as the future of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and why?

Answer
NATO was originally designed to be a military cooperative between North America and Europe to defend against potential aggression by the Soviet Union and its satellite States.

Since that threat no longer exists, it is hard to see a real purpose for NATO anymore.  Some people think it is important to maintain alliances to prevent aggression, but doing so really does go against the tradition of US foreign policy up until WWII to stay out of entangling alliances that could lead to greater involvement in foreign wars.

I hope this helps!
- Mike  

Add to this Answer    Ask a Question



  Rate this Answer
   Was this answer helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

     
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.