AllExperts > Experts 
Search      
Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Ted Nesbitt
Expertise
I will answer short, to-the-point questions on all aspects of American politics -- legislative, executive, and judicial for the federal government and all fifty states. I use the Lexis-Nexis database for information concerning court cases in the state courts, the U. S. District Courts, and the U. S. Supreme Court. I do NOT have the time to work with lengthy problems or to read and evaluate papers.

Experience
I have been politically in a PAC since 1986 and have served state
government in an information capacity since 1980.

I have been a volunteer at the grammar and writing site at allexperts.com for more than two years.

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Arts/Humanities > Political Science > Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics > third rail of politics

Topic: Legislation, Presidential & Congressional Politics



Expert: Ted Nesbitt
Date: 6/30/2004
Subject: third rail of politics

Question
Social security is called the third rail of politics. What are the first two?


Answer
Dear Ron:

"The third rail of politics" is a METAPHOR.  There are no other "rails."  In other words, there is no first rail and no second rail.

The metaphor refers to subway trains and their tracks.  There ARE three rails for subway trains.  The usual two are the tracks/rails on which the subway cars travel.

The "third rail" is not for the wheels of the train.  Rather, it is the electrical device that provides the power to run the train.  If a person touches that "electric rail," he would die, because of the high voltage.

Thus, in applying the metaphor to politics, any politician who touches Social Security -- tries to change those benefits, especially by restricting them -- is essentially doomed.  He or she would be killed in an election, because of the "high voltage" nature of Social Security.

Ted Nesbitt

Add to this Answer    Ask a Question



  Rate this Answer
   Was this answer helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

     
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.