AllExperts > ObGyn/Pregnancy issues 
Search      
ObGyn/Pregnancy issues
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More ObGyn/Pregnancy issues Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More ObGyn/Pregnancy issues Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about ObGyn/Pregnancy issues
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Dr. Harriet Johnson
Expertise
I have been a Gynecologist for 3 years and can answer questions on early symptoms of pregnancy, pre-natal care, miscarriage, birth defects, nutrition, exercise, potential problems, concerns, labor and delivery, post-natal care etc. I can also answer any questions related to female issues.

Experience
OB/GYN Physician for 3 years.

Education/Credentials
Graduated from medical school with an MD degree and then went on to complete my residency at the University of Illinois at Chicago Medical Center. I am board-certified in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Health/Fitness > Obstetrics/Gynecology > ObGyn/Pregnancy issues > subchorionic hemorrhage

ObGyn/Pregnancy issues - subchorionic hemorrhage


Expert: Dr. Harriet Johnson - 10/20/2009

Question
I asked this same question yesterday and got a two word answer and I was really not impressed with the lack of concern for my question. This time I have chosen you in hopes of getting a detailed answer. I am now 15 weeks and 4 days pregnant. I am a 23 year old type 1 diabetic. At week 7 and 4 days I went for my first scan to determine fetal age. At that time they found a small subchorionic hemorrhage. It was expected to go away without concern. At week 13 I was given an ultrasound for testing of abnormalities. Non were found but the SCH had grown a lot. I have never had any bleeding. All research reports and studies talk about a SCH with vaginal bleeding. I can not find an answer to my question, which is this...Is it a better outcome in general to not have vaginal bleeding? I am on pelvic rest, trying to drink lots of water, and I know the odds are different according to who you ask. But is it better not to bleed? I am asking this question on behalf of several people who are also not experiencing bleeding. I do have cramps. And horrible back pains but they could be unrelated. I knew I was pregnant because of cramping, is this a cramp that is caused by the bleeding? In your experiences in practice do you find most women who have no bleeding do better? I have attached a pic of my ultrasound that shows the bleed. I really look forward to some up to date information as I will possibly be writing a book.

Answer
Hi Kayla,

It is better to not bleed, it increases the chance of the hemorrhage resolving itself, therefore your pregnancy can continue without complication. The cramps you are experiencing are most likely due to your uterus contracting, make sure you're resting and drinking enough water. Generally woman that don't bleed do better, because it resolves faster, however this isn't always the case. Good luck!

Add to this Answer   Ask a Question


 
User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. AllExperts, AllExperts.com, and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. All rights reserved.