AllExperts > Oncology (General Cancer) 
Search      
Oncology (General Cancer)
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Oncology (General Cancer) Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Oncology (General Cancer) Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Oncology (General Cancer)
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Michael Dean
Expertise
Can answer General information on the causes of cancer and cancer prevention. Information on current cancer research and breakthroughs. The genetics of cancer The risk of smoking for lung cancer and other cancers, as well as SIDS, heart disease, and vision loss. Cannot answer Specific medical questions

Experience
Cancer Researcher for over 20 years Author of the book "Empty Cribs-The impact of smoking on child health" www.artsciencepub.com. Author of over 200 scientific articles on cancer, genetics and human disease. Multiple interviews in print, TV and radio media.

Organizations
American Association for Cancer Research American Association of Human Genetics

Publications
Scientific journals (Science, Nature, NE Journal Medicine, etc.) Scientific American, Discovery Medicine, Nature Reviews in Cancer

Education/Credentials
PhD. in Biochemistry from Boston University School of Medicine

Awards and Honors
Young Investigator award-American Association of Cancer Research

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Health/Fitness > Medical Specialists > Oncology (General Cancer) > Familial lung cancer??

Oncology (General Cancer) - Familial lung cancer??


Expert: Michael Dean - 6/9/2009

Question
Hello Michael, I have written you before regarding this subject.  To give you some back story, my mother was a smoker and diagnosed with non-small cell adenocarcinoma at the age of 47.  She passed a little over a year later at the age of 48.  You had told me that my and my sisters risk was pretty low since we did not smoke.  I found an article that I read and scared me all over again.  I will attach it here, but can you help me decipher this??  Does this mean that we are more danger than originally thought??  What do these numbers mean??

Also, can you tell me what would constitute a "family history?"  Would there have to be more than 2 family members to qualify as a significant history??  My great-great uncle had it and passed I think before I was born or shortly after so I know that he was in his 50's or 60's respectivley.

Here is the article.  Please help me.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To clarify the possibility of a hereditary predisposition to lung cancer, we investigated the association between a family history of lung cancer and subsequent risk of lung cancer in a large-scale, population-based cohort study. DESIGN: We investigated 102,255 middle-aged and older Japanese subjects (48,834 men and 53,421 women) with 13-year follow-up. A total of 791 cases of lung cancer were newly diagnosed during the follow-up period. RESULTS: A family history of lung cancer in a first-degree relative was associated with a significantly increased risk of lung cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 1.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31 to 2.88). The association was stronger in women than in men (HR, 2.65; 95% CI, 1.40 to 5.01 and HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.78, respectively), and in never-smokers than in current smokers (HR, 2.48; 95% CI, 1.27 to 4.84 and HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 0.99 to 3.00, respectively). In addition, family history was more strongly associated with the risk of squamous cell carcinoma than with other histologic types (HR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.37 to 5.68), while no clear increase in risk was observed in adenocarcinoma and small cell carcinoma. A family history of overall cancer was not associated with an increased risk of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that those with a family history of lung cancer are more likely to acquire lung cancer themselves.

Answer
Dear Cori,

Thanks for writing back. This is an interesting study.

They are saying that a family history, increases your risk of lung cancer. A first degree relative is someone one step away (parents and siblings). They say that this risk is 2-3 times higher.

That may sound like a lot, but the lung cancer risk of a non-smoker is very low. So a 2-3 fold increase still means that your risk is very low. It is something to mention to your doctor, and like all of us, you should avoid secondhand smoke.

You can lower risk overall of cancer (and many other diseases) a lot, by eating right, exercising, maintaining a normal weight, getting regular checkups and cancer screening, checking your skin and doing breast self exams. Some studies point to vitamin D as an agent to lower cancer risk, including lung.

So I really would not worry and focus on positive things that you can do to improve health.

I hope this helps,

Michael Dean, Ph.D.
Author "Empty Cribs-The Impact of Smoking on Child Health"
http//www.artsciencepub.com


Add to this Answer   Ask a Question


 
User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Kids' Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. AllExperts, AllExperts.com, and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. All rights reserved.