AllExperts > Experts 
Search      

Photography

Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Photography Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Photography
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Steve Meltzer
Expertise
I am a professional photographer and I've been shooting for newspapers, magazines, commercial clients and artists for over 30 years. I have shot stock photography for dozens of years and in 1977 created West Stock (Seattle, WA) which was one of the first to produce stock photo CDs and later one of the first to establish an online stock photo slaes site. I have a new book on digital photography "PHOTOGRAPHING ARTS, CRAFTS AND COLLECTIBLES (Lark Books, 2007)which is available at Amazon.com, eBay.com and in bookstores like Barnes & Noble and Borders. I have another book, CAPTURE THE LIGHT which will be puiblished in November, 2008. I write 20-30 feature articles and columns for regional and national publications a year. My education includes studying with photographers like Cornell Capa, Duane Michels and Oliver Gagliani (from the Ansel Adams Center.)

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Arts/Humanities > Visual Arts > Photography > Digital and film

Topic: Photography



Expert: Steve Meltzer
Date: 12/14/2006
Subject: Digital and film

Question
Do you think it's right that a photography class of a school will not accept digital prints because they want to keep the basic fine art photography classes? Of course, there are digital photography courses in this school.

Answer
Mingming

I think that a photography class that won't accept digital prints is silly.

I've been a photographer for over thirty years and taught photography class at times over those years. I studied B/W printing with the folks from Ansel Adams Yosemite center and owned a gallery/rental darkroom. And I know that its not about film or digital its about picture making.

And I totally reject the term "Fine Art" its meaningless. Who determines what is fine art, who cares? If a photo is good, if it has impact and stopping power if it reaches the viewer and gets a response who cares if its 'fine art'? What's fine?

Of greater importance is to teach students to love photography and to see the world in visual terms.

Its sad that photography has come down to film versus digital. I think its really film AND digital. If you are a photographer, and I mean a really good photographer with a good eye, it doesn't matter whether you shoot with a digital camera, a film camera or a pinhole camera.

So I don't agree with the school. Image making counts but whether a print if film or digital doesn't.

I also feel that some old time photographers use the darkroom as a barrier to keep them somehow special. Digital is too "easy" for them and lets too many people make good pictures.

For them its supposed to be hard. They are wrong.

Steve

Add to this Answer    Ask a Question



  Rate this Answer
   Was this answer helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

     
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.