AllExperts > Experts 
Search      

Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant)

Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant) Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant)
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Jonathan Dever, Esq
Expertise
Real Estate Law, Buying Selling, Investor, all types of acquring property through "creative techniques" and fraud avoidance

Experience
Super Lawyer by Law and Politics for the last three years, part of over 900 transactions in the last 6 years

Organizations
Ohio Bar Assn Greene County Bar Assn Champaign County Bar Assn

Publications
Personal web site and web articles

Education/Credentials
JD - Capital University MA - IU of Penn BA - U of Cincinnati

Awards and Honors
Super Lawyer 2005, 2006, 2007 Who is Who, Lawyers 2006, 2007

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Real Estate > Apartment Living/Rental > Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant) > Landlord/tenant issue

Topic: Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant)



Expert: Jonathan Dever, Esq
Date: 6/26/2008
Subject: Landlord/tenant issue

Question
Good evening Mr. Dever,

In Grays Harbor County,WA  the Plaintiff (landlord) Filed a Complaint for Unlawful Detainer. The Defendant (tenant) was Ordered to appear in Court for a Motion To Show Cause hearing. The defendant appeared in Court at the time specified . The Plaintiff, however, failed to appear at the hearing and the Presiding Judge "Struck" the hearing. So, it was stricken. The defendant thanked the Judge and exited the courtroom.  Two days later, the defendant received ANOTHER order from the Court to appear for ANOTHER Motion to Show Cause hearing. The latter Motion To Show Cause had the same case or cause number as the prior Motion To Show Cause. Is it proper procedure that the Plaintiff in this case would have to RE- FILE the Complaint For Unlawful Detainer and then Set another Motion To Show Cause hearing??  I feel that the plaintiff should  be subjected to sanctions by the Court, just in the same manner that the defendant is. Had the defendant failed to appear for the Motion to Show Cause, the judgement would have automatically been in favor of the Plaintiff. Therefore, shouldn't the judgement be in favor of the defendant? Without having to pay another filing fee opens the door for any plaintiff in these cases to "harass" a defendant at the cost of the Court, does it not? Isn't the filing fee ALSO implemented to deter any "game Playing" in these matters? And shouldn't this case be dismissed for the fact that the Plaintiff failed to appear? What does the defendant do in this case? File a Motion for Dismissal,or???    
    Thank you for your time and consideration.
                         God Bless,  
                                    JB in WA.

Answer
A show cause hearing is a hearing ordered by a Court when a party fails to appear at Court.  It is not necessarily related to the Complaint as filed.  If you failed to show up for court as an example, a Judge would issue a show cause order.  The offending party would then give a reason for their absence.  beyond that simple explanation, I cannot assist further without reviewing the case file.  If you need someone to do that, I would be more than happy to.  Head over to my site and register for free www.deverlaw.com.  Enter a support ticket and the secretary will create a file room for you.

Add to this Answer    Ask a Question



  Rate this Answer
   Was this answer helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

     
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.