AllExperts > Experts 
Search      
Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant)
Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant) Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant)
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Jonathan Dever, Esq
Expertise
Real Estate Law, Buying Selling, Investor, all types of acquiring property through "creative techniques" and fraud avoidance

Experience
Super Lawyer by Law and Politics for the last three years, part of over 900 transactions in the last 6 years

Organizations
Ohio Bar Assn Greene County Bar Assn Champaign County Bar Assn

Publications
Personal web site and web articles

Education/Credentials
JD - Capital University MA - IU of Penn BA - U of Cincinnati

Awards and Honors
Super Lawyer 2005, 2006, 2007 Who is Who, Lawyers 2006, 2007

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Real Estate > Apartment Living/Rental > Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant) > Landlord's requirement to keep Carpet Records

Real Estate Law (esp. Landlord-Tenant) - Landlord's requirement to keep Carpet Records


Expert: Jonathan Dever, Esq - 8/3/2008

Question
We have irreparable carpet damage from a pet in our apartment of one year.  We have no qualms about paying the necessary fees.  Nevertheless based on my research (although limited) we should be able to use the carpet lifetime's and normal replacement age in our negotiations.

My question is: Are complexes required by law to keep a record of each apartment's carpet replacement?  In other words they cannot just say it was new carpet when you moved in unless they had written documentation?  In addition refundable pet deposits and other refundable deposits should (if no other damages are incurred) be allowed to negate the corresponding portion of the cost.  

Thanks for your time.

Answer
There are no laws regulating how one runs the daily aspects of their business (thank god).  Pet deposits are meant to offset damages, but like a regular deposit, if you destroy the place, do not think for a second that a simple security deposit covers thousands of dollars in damage.

Your arguments are for a Court of law.  If the landlord says it is new, and it was new when you moved in, your are going to be found responsible.  All that you are now debating is the cost of replacement.

Add to this Answer    Ask a Question



  Rate this Answer
   Was this answer helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

     
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.