More Scientology Answers
Question Library
Ask a question about Scientology
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login
Awards
About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer
|
| |
|
|
| |
| | | |
About Patrick Lemaire
Expertise I can answer questions about the history, beliefs, organizational structure and writings of Scientology.
Experience I studied all the books as well as 500 lectures on the subject. I have been a staff member for 16 years at the local, continental and international level holding administrative functions. I have worked in their organiations in Paris, Copenhagen and Los Angeles. I have been part of their management. I have worked as a translator and editor on nearly all their books and all their lectures released from 1997 to 2007.
Education/Credentials I am a college graduate. In Scientology I have an FEBC, their highest administrative training. I completed 50 Scientology courses.
| | |
| |
You are here: Experts > Religion/Spirituality > Scientology > Scientology > Clear
Expert: Patrick Lemaire - 11/2/2009
Question "Clears aren't allowed to describe the state in detail."
For what reason? Is it because those who are 'unclear' are expected to misperceive the info given and therefore form an incorrect opinion of what it is to be a 'clear', leading to further confusion on their part?
Answer You answered it yourself. Nothing has been added to a Clear and that's usually how people think of abilities: you gain something. You become Clear by removing your own ideas that you can't do this or that.
On the other hand, if Scientology is bogus, it is a good way to hide that it brings you nothing except convincing you it did bring you something. Once the person has formed his own conviction, he can attest to the state of clear.
If it's true that people are bound by their own postulates (decisions to be) then it is paramount that the person forms the postulate by himself.
Add to this Answer Ask a Question
|
|