AllExperts > Experts 
Search      

Tax Law (Questions About Taxes)

Volunteer
Answers to thousands of questions
 Home · More Questions · Answer Library  · Encyclopedia ·
More Tax Law (Questions About Taxes) Answers
Question Library

Ask a question about Tax Law (Questions About Taxes)
Volunteer
Experts of the Month
Expert Login

Awards

About Us
Tell friends
Link to Us
Disclaimer

 
 
 
 
About Mike Wellman
Expertise
I was a former Manager with Price Waterhouse, now PricewaterhouseCoopers, the largest accounting firm in the world. I have had clients in almost every industry and of every size. I will only answer questions dealing with IRS problems such as delinquent tax returns, Offers in Compromise (Tax Settlement), IRS collection matters including installment agreements, liens, levies, seizures, audits, appeals, innocent spouse claims and injured spouse claims. All other will be referred to the question pool.

Experience
Over 25 years experience in taxation specializing in IRS collections, examinations and appeals.

Publications
New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Your Money.

Education/Credentials
BBA, Baylor University.

Awards and Honors
IRSOS.com won the Knowledgeweb award for educational excellence for content.

 
   

You are here:  Experts > Business > Corporate Law > Tax Law (Questions About Taxes) > Offer In Compromise

Topic: Tax Law (Questions About Taxes)



Expert: Mike Wellman
Date: 12/19/2007
Subject: Offer In Compromise

Question
I am preparing an offer in compromise.  The taxpayer owns approximately 7 parcels of real property, most of which are upside down(the mortgages are more than the fair market value.)  In determining the Reasonable Collection Potential, do I disregard the upside down properties and just figure the remaining properties, or does the service view all of the properties as a whole (in which case the collective sum of the properties will be upside down)?

I thank you in advance for your answer.

Answer
They will look at each property individually. The lowest a property can be valued is zero.

That said, if all the properties were cross-pledged, an argument could be made to allow all the debt. But if each note is secured by a single property, the excess debt will not be allowed.

Add to this Answer    Ask a Question



  Rate this Answer
   Was this answer helpful?
Not at allDefinitely              
   12345  

     
About Us | Advertise on This Site | User Agreement | Privacy Policy | Help
Copyright  © 2008 About, Inc. About and About.com are registered trademarks of About, Inc. The About logo is a trademark of About, Inc. All rights reserved.